Properly ignore revert branches pattern#18
Merged
RomainCscn merged 2 commits intomainfrom Feb 27, 2026
Merged
Conversation
axelniklasson
approved these changes
Feb 27, 2026
RomainCscn
deleted the
romain/lin-61240-properly-ignore-revert-type-branch-in-cli
branch
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When a PR is reverted on GitHub, the merge commit of the revert has an auto-generated branch name like
revert-571-romain/bac-39. The branch extractor picks up BAC-39 and adds it to the release, the opposite of what should happen.On Gitlab, branch is named
revert-<sha>so not a problem.This is step 1 of a larger plan to handle reverts in a better way. Next step is actually identifying reverts and removing issues from the release (for in-progress scheduled). Continuous TBD what we want.